Minimal Workflow Disruption
Standard TLIF procedure with 5-minute pre-op planning, no new equipment, minimal training required.
Many Spinal Fusion Patients Experience Subsidence
Published studies report radiographic subsidence rates of 51%1 in using standard implants, with 6.1% of patients requiring revision surgery2. The problem is significantly worse in compromised bone quality patients, where weak bone cannot withstand concentrated loading from standard cage designs.
Do you proceed with spinal fusion surgery knowing standard cages have high failure rates, or do you turn away patients who could benefit from this procedure?
Why Anatomy-Only Solutions Are Not Enough
Patient-specific implants that only match anatomy can still lead to subsidence. Fitting the bone shape doesn't address load distribution through strong bone, away from weak bone.
The OptimalPSI Difference: Our optimization algorithm optimizes for bone quality, not just anatomy, creating variable internal implant architecture that directs load to strong bone and away from vulnerable areas.
The Result: 75% subsidence reduction vs. anatomy-only patient-specific solutions, 90% vs. standard cages in pre-clinical testing*,**.
Learn About Our Evidence →Potential Benefits for Your Practice
Patient-specific orthopedic devices may qualify for enhanced DRG reimbursement pathways~, supporting the business case for adoption.
Designed to meaningfully reduce subsidence risk vs. currently available off-the-shelf cages and anatomy-only solutions. As a TLIF solution, OptimalPSI also offers single-position surgical access across all lumbar segments.
5-minute Pre-OP planning will provide upfront information on each patient, aiming to replace guesswork with data-driven confidence.
Confidently offer fusion to patients you might otherwise turn away.